Predictive Maintenance for Global Manufacturer

The Challenge

A global manufacturer of industrial equipment was facing significant losses from unplanned downtime. Each hour of production stoppage cost approximately $150,000, and reactive maintenance was consuming an ever-larger portion of the operations budget.

Existing SCADA systems collected vast amounts of sensor data, but the data sat in silos, analyzed only when problems occurred.

Our Approach

Phase 1: Data Integration

We built a real-time data pipeline to unify sensor data across 12 manufacturing facilities:

• Pub/Sub for real-time event ingestion
• Dataflow for stream processing and enrichment
• BigQuery for historical storage and analysis
• Bigtable for low-latency time-series lookups

Phase 2: Predictive Models

Using historical failure data and sensor readings, we developed models for:

1. Remaining useful life (RUL) prediction for critical components
2. Anomaly detection for early warning of unusual behavior
3. Root cause analysis to identify failure patterns

Phase 3: Operations Integration

The models were integrated into existing operations workflows:

• Real-time dashboards for maintenance teams
• Automated work order generation
• Mobile alerts for urgent conditions
• Integration with spare parts inventory

Technical Architecture

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    Manufacturing Floor                       │
├──────────┬──────────┬──────────┬──────────┬────────────────┤
│ Sensors  │ PLCs     │ SCADA    │ MES      │ Historians     │
└────┬─────┴────┬─────┴────┬─────┴────┬─────┴───────┬────────┘
     │          │          │          │             │
     └──────────┴──────────┼──────────┴─────────────┘
                           │
                           ▼
                    ┌──────────────┐
                    │   Pub/Sub    │
                    └──────┬───────┘
                           │
              ┌────────────┼────────────┐
              │            │            │
              ▼            ▼            ▼
       ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐
       │ Dataflow │ │ Bigtable │ │ BigQuery │
       │ (Stream) │ │ (Realtime)│ │ (History)│
       └────┬─────┘ └────┬─────┘ └────┬─────┘
            │            │            │
            └────────────┼────────────┘
                         │
                         ▼
                  ┌──────────────┐
                  │  Vertex AI   │
                  │   Models     │
                  └──────┬───────┘
                         │
         ┌───────────────┼───────────────┐
         │               │               │
         ▼               ▼               ▼
   ┌──────────┐   ┌──────────┐   ┌──────────┐
   │Dashboard │   │  Alerts  │   │   CMMS   │
   │          │   │          │   │ (Work    │
   │          │   │          │   │  Orders) │
   └──────────┘   └──────────┘   └──────────┘

Model Development

Feature Engineering

We engineered hundreds of features from raw sensor data:

• Statistical aggregations (mean, std, percentiles)
• Frequency domain features (FFT analysis)
• Trend indicators (slope, acceleration)
• Interaction features between related sensors

Model Training

The predictive models were trained using:

• Gradient boosted trees for classification (will fail / won’t fail)
• Survival analysis for remaining useful life estimation
• Isolation forests for anomaly detection

Continuous Learning

Models are retrained monthly with new failure data:

# Automated retraining pipeline
pipeline = Pipeline([
    ('feature_extraction', FeatureExtractor()),
    ('model', AutoML(
        task='classification',
        optimization_metric='recall',
        time_budget=3600
    ))
])

# Triggered by Cloud Scheduler
def retrain_model():
    new_data = load_recent_failures()
    pipeline.fit(new_data)
    validate_model(pipeline)
    if passes_validation():
        deploy_model(pipeline)

Results

Operational Impact

Metric	Before	After	Improvement
Unplanned Downtime	847 hrs/year	550 hrs/year	35% reduction
Mean Time to Repair	4.2 hours	2.8 hours	33% faster
Maintenance Costs	$24M/year	$17.3M/year	28% reduction
Parts Inventory	$8.2M	$6.1M	26% reduction

Predictive Accuracy

• 87% accuracy in predicting failures 7+ days in advance
• 94% of critical failures predicted with enough lead time for planned maintenance
• False positive rate below 5%

Implementation Timeline

Phase	Duration	Milestone
Discovery & Data Assessment	4 weeks	Data quality baseline
Infrastructure Setup	6 weeks	Real-time pipeline operational
Model Development	8 weeks	Initial models deployed
Integration & Rollout	6 weeks	Full production deployment
Optimization	Ongoing	Continuous improvement

Key Success Factors

1. Executive sponsorship from both IT and Operations leadership
2. Cross-functional team including data engineers, data scientists, and domain experts
3. Phased deployment starting with highest-value equipment
4. Change management to shift from reactive to predictive culture

Client Testimonial

“The ROI was evident within the first quarter. But beyond the numbers, what impressed us most was how the system helped our maintenance teams work smarter. They went from firefighting to strategic planning.”

— VP of Operations, Global Industrial Equipment Manufacturer

---

Ready to transform your maintenance operations? Get in touch to discuss your predictive maintenance needs.